FIRST THINGS FIRST
March 14, 2010
"God made him who had no sin to be a sin offering for us, so that in him we
might become the righteousness of God" (2 Cor 5:21)
On the Christian
radio station the other day, one of the folks asked the question of a noted
seminary professor if he thought the average Christian could explain the Gospel
in 2 mn or less. The feeling was that in this day and age, in order to give to
anyone who asks the Hope you have within you, that you would have to deliver it
in that short time frame or your prospective convert would lose interest. This
professor's humble opinion was that most church goers couldn't do it and most
really didn't know the Gospel.
Now I realize that this is an
above-average congregation and that all of you could answer the question as
succinctly as I could. When the host asked the professor to define the Gospel,
I yelled out loud in the middle of Sokol park (luckily deep in the woods with no
audience other than the big guy) "I Corinthians 15:3"!
The noted
professor obviously knew his stuff because in the next instant, he said: "It's
all there in I Cor 15. It's the Gospel, or as Eugene Peterson calls it "the
message in a nutshell". Paul laid it out clearly and succinctly: "the first
thing I did was place before you what was placed so emphatically before me: (I
would say that Jesus showing up physically on the road to Damascus is quite
emphatic); that the Messiah died for our sins, exactly as the scripture tells
it; that he was buried; that he was raised from death on the third day, again
exactly as scripture says, that he presented himself alive to Peter..." (I Cor
15 3-5ff)
That's it! That is the Gospel that is the power of God for
the salvation of everyone who believes (Rom 1:16), nothing more, nothing less.
The Bible tells us that there would be wolves in sheep's clothing teaching in
seminary and from church pulpits, who would add things to the Gospel to make it
more palatable (i.e, easier to swallow) for future intelligentsia. Things like
the resurrection not being a literal raising of Jesus' dead body from the grave,
but an "Easter moment" where the disciples could have hope, even though the
master had died, were supposed to make the gospel more believable to this
scientifically savvy generation.
To that, Paul says: "let me be blunt:
if one of us even an angel from heaven, were to preach other than what we
preached originally, let him be cursed. I said it once, I will say it again; if
anyone regardless of reputation or credentials, preaches something other than
what you received originally, let them be cursed". (Gal 1: 8-9) So Paul, how do
you really feel about adding to or subtracting from, or changing the Gospel to
make more relevant the simple Gospel of Jesus Christ?
So you see, we
have no excuse not to share the good news of Jesus dying for our sins and being
raised and on the throne to assist us in living the life that Jesus asks his
followers to live. It's simple; you don't have to be a brilliant theologian (in
fact, in most cases, that is a serious liability), we just have to be obedient,
knowing that the simple story that Jesus died for our sins and that if one
receives this gift of His precious death on our behalf and commits to live no
longer for ourselves but for Him who died and rose again, they too can have the
assurance that their sins are forgiven and that an eternity of blissful intimacy
with Jesus awaits.
We don't have to add to it, and it's the message
itself that has the power to break down the differences, not our oratorical
skill. It is a simple Gospel that some believe 80% of the people in the pews on
any given Sunday really don't get or understand in a way that would give them
assurance of their reconciled relationship with their creator.
I'm glad
all y'all know it; you will be blessed if you share it more and more as the days
ahead get darker and darker.
YTAT
Peace and Love,
Fr. Mike